2004 BMW 745 vs. 2000 Opel Omega

To start off, 2004 BMW 745 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 745 (322 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (305 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 745 should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 745 weights approximately 715 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 745. (447 Nm). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 745.

Compare all specifications: