2004 BMW 745 vs. 2000 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2004 BMW 745 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 745 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 745 (310 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 745 should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 745 weights approximately 950 kg more than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW 745 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 745. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 745 (451 Nm) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 745 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 745 | 2000 Seat Inca Kombi | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | 745 | Inca Kombi |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1391 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 451 Nm | 107 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 1035 kg |