2004 BMW 745 vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 745. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 745 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 745 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 745 weights approximately 423 kg more than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW 745. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 745 (451 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda CR-V. (190 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 745 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 745 | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 745 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 451 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 1562 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 13.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 58 L |