2004 BMW 745 vs. 2008 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Opel Omega is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 745. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 745 would be higher. At 4,390 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 745 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 745 weights approximately 696 kg more than 2008 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 745 (447 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Omega. (203 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 745 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 745 | 2008 Opel Omega | |
| Make | BMW | Opel |
| Model | 745 | Omega |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4390 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2025 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 75 L |
