2004 BMW 760 vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2004 BMW 760 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,129 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 760 (438 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (193 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 760 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 760 (602 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (410 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 760 | 1954 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 760 | 40 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6129 cc | 5279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 438 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 602 Nm | 410 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2210 kg | 1720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3110 mm |