2004 BMW 760 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2004 BMW 760 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 6,129 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 BMW 760 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 760. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 760. (602 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 760. 2004 BMW 760 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 BMW 760 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 760 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 760 | HRT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6129 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 438 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 602 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |