2004 BMW 760 vs. 2005 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2005 Isuzu KB is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 760 would be higher. At 6,129 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 760 (438 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 2005 Isuzu KB. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 2005 Isuzu KB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 760 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2005 Isuzu KB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 760 (602 Nm) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Isuzu KB. (265 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 760 | 2005 Isuzu KB | |
Make | BMW | Isuzu |
Model | 760 | KB |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6129 cc | 2998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 438 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 602 Nm | 265 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2210 kg | 1810 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 83 L |