2004 BMW M3 vs. 1948 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1948 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW M3 | 1948 Maserati A6GCS | |
| Make | BMW | Maserati |
| Model | M3 | A6GCS |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2320 mm |
