2004 BMW M3 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP) has 277 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 579 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | FX |
Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 136 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |