2004 BMW M3 vs. 1958 Holden FE
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Holden FE would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 1958 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 569 kg more than 1958 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Holden FE. (150 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1958 Holden FE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | FE |
Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2670 mm |