2004 BMW M3 vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 769 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (84 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | M3 | Herald |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 84 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 29 L |