2004 BMW M3 vs. 1962 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1962 Lotus Seven | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | M3 | Seven |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 29 L |