2004 BMW M3 vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 974 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1963 Seat 600 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | M3 | 600 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 40 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |