2004 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP) has 275 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 565 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | M3 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2430 mm |