2004 BMW M3 vs. 1966 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 949 kg more than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1966 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | BMW | Steyr |
Model | M3 | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 641 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 41 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1510 mm |