2004 BMW M3 vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 580 kg more than 2004 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW M3 | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
| Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | M3 | Camargue |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 107 L |
