2004 BMW M3 vs. 1978 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 589 kg more than 1978 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW M3 | 1978 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | M3 | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2430 mm |
