2004 BMW M3 vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP) has 243 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 895 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | 323 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 355 Nm | 116 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |