2004 BMW M3 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 727 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M3 | 66 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |