2004 BMW M3 vs. 1982 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1982 Talbot 1510. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Talbot 1510. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1982 Talbot 1510. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Talbot 1510, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Talbot 1510. (108 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1982 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | BMW | Talbot |
Model | M3 | 1510 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 108 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 76.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2610 mm |