2004 BMW M3 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (145 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4690 mm |