2004 BMW M3 vs. 1989 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 469 kg more than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1989 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | M3 | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2580 mm |