2004 BMW M3 vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (174 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1989 Citroen XM | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | M3 | XM |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 66 L |