2004 BMW M3 vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 2004 BMW M3. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (350 Nm). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | XJ220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 642 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 340 mm |