2004 BMW M3 vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (128 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW M3 | 1994 Rover 200 | |
| Make | BMW | Rover |
| Model | M3 | 200 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2510 mm |
