2004 BMW M3 vs. 1999 Nissan Z
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Z would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1999 Nissan Z. (197 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan Z. (245 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 1999 Nissan Z | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | M3 | Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2450 mm |