2004 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2000 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2000 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2000 Eagle Vision | |
Make | BMW | Eagle |
Model | M3 | Vision |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |