2004 BMW M3 vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 GMC Yukon. (283 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Yukon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 515 kg more than 2004 BMW M3.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (481 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M3 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 481 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 2290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2950 mm |