2004 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Tata E would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2000 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2000 Tata E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata E. (210 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | BMW | Tata |
Model | M3 | E |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2810 mm |