2004 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (350 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2002 Holden HSV | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | HSV |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 5698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 692 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |