2004 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2004 BMW M3. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 116 kg more than 2004 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (350 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | XJR |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 525 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 18.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 85 L |