2004 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Tundra. (187 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2003 Toyota Tundra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Tundra.

Compare all specifications:

2004 BMW M3 2003 Toyota Tundra
Make BMW Toyota
Model M3 Tundra
Year Released 2004 2003
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3169 cc 3400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 317 HP 187 HP
Engine RPM 7250 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 355 Nm 298 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1775 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 5530 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 3270 mm