2004 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser

To start off, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 375 kg more than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (188 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser.

Compare all specifications:

2004 BMW M3 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser
Make BMW Chrysler
Model M3 PT Cruiser
Year Released 2004 2005
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3169 cc 1996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 317 HP 253 HP
Engine RPM 7250 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 355 Nm 188 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 83 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.5:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1775 kg 1400 kg
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 57 L