2004 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2005 Ford Falcon. (200 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 194 kg more than 2005 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.

Compare all specifications:

2004 BMW M3 2005 Ford Falcon
Make BMW Ford
Model M3 Falcon
Year Released 2004 2005
Body Type Convertible Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3169 cc 3984 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 317 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 7250 RPM 4900 RPM
Torque 355 Nm 357 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 92.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.5:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1775 kg 1581 kg
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2930 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 70 L