2004 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 19 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | M3 | K2700 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |