2004 BMW M3 vs. 2007 Ford E-150
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (389 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2007 Ford E-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 132 L |