2004 BMW M3 vs. 2008 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC70 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2008 Volvo XC70. (185 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo XC70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 143 kg more than 2008 Volvo XC70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo XC70 (542 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2008 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M3 | XC70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 542 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |