2004 BMW M3 vs. 2009 GMC Savana
To start off, 2009 GMC Savana is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2009 GMC Savana. (301 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 GMC Savana weights approximately 660 kg more than 2004 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Savana (441 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 2009 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2009 GMC Savana | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M3 | Savana |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 2435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 117 L |