2004 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Acura ZDX
To start off, 2011 Acura ZDX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Acura ZDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2011 Acura ZDX. (300 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Acura ZDX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura ZDX weights approximately 225 kg more than 2004 BMW M3.
Because 2011 Acura ZDX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Acura ZDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Acura ZDX (366 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 2011 Acura ZDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2011 Acura ZDX | |
Make | BMW | Acura |
Model | M3 | ZDX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4887 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1994 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1595 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |