2004 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Rezzo
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Rezzo. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 168 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Rezzo. (176 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2011 Chevrolet Rezzo | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | M3 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |