2004 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC90 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2011 Volvo XC90. (240 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2004 BMW M3.
Because 2011 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M3 | 2011 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M3 | XC90 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |