2004 BMW M3 vs. 2012 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion.
Because 2004 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion. (121 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW M3 | 2012 Daihatsu Sirion | |
| Make | BMW | Daihatsu |
| Model | M3 | Sirion |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79.7 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
