2004 BMW M5 vs. 1998 Buick Regal

To start off, 2004 BMW M5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Buick Regal would be higher. At 4,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M5 (500 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1998 Buick Regal. (205 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 1998 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M5 weights approximately 264 kg more than 1998 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 BMW M5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M5 (520 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Buick Regal. (312 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Buick Regal. 1998 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 2004 BMW M5 has manual transmission. 2004 BMW M5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 BMW M5 1998 Buick Regal
Make BMW Buick
Model M5 Regal
Year Released 2004 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4999 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 10 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 500 HP 205 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 520 Nm 312 Nm
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 96.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.2 mm 86.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 12.0:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1758 kg 1494 kg
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2780 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 68 L