2004 BMW M6 vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2004 BMW M6 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 4,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 415 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M6 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1946 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW M6 | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | M6 | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 4998 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2850 mm |
