2004 BMW M6 vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2004 BMW M6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 4,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 464 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M6 weights approximately 825 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M6 (520 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2004 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW M6 | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | BMW | Wartburg |
Model | M6 | 312 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4998 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 520 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6100 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 6.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 43 L |