2004 BMW M6 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 BMW M6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2004 BMW M6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW M6 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M6 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4998 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
