2004 BMW M6 vs. 1966 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2004 BMW M6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (288 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 219 kg more than 2004 BMW M6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW M6 | 1966 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M6 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4998 cc | 6954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 2004 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |
