2004 BMW M6 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 BMW M6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 451 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M6 weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M6 (520 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW M6 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | M6 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 4998 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 520 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2160 mm |
