2004 BMW X3 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2004 BMW X3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,925 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X3 (225 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X3 weights approximately 970 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW X3 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | X3 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 2925 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2010 mm |
