2004 BMW X3 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2004 BMW X3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,925 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW X3 (225 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW X3 weights approximately 1051 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW X3 (290 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm). This means 2004 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW X3 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | BMW | ZAZ |
Model | X3 | 966 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2925 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 72 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2170 mm |